| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Drug Law EnforcementA Review of the Evaluation LiteratureGriffith University, L.Mazerolle{at}griffith.edu.au
Griffith University
Griffith University This article describes the results of a systematic review of drug law enforcement evaluations. The authors describe the search procedures and document the results in five main categories: international/national interventions (e.g., interdiction and drug seizure), reactive/ directed interventions (e.g., crackdowns, raids, buy-busts, saturation patrol, etc.), proactive/ partnership interventions (e.g., third-party policing, problem-oriented policing, community policing, drug nuisance abatement, etc.), individualized interventions (e.g., arrest referral and diversion), or interventions that used a combination of reactive/directed and proactive/ partnership strategies. Results indicate that proactive interventions involving partnerships between the police and third parties and/or community entities appear to be more effective at reducing both drug and nondrug problems in drug problem places than are reactive/ directed approaches. But the general quality of research in drug law enforcement is poor, the range of interventions that have been evaluated is limited, and more high-quality research is needed across a greater variety of drug interventions.
Key Words: drug law enforcement police strategies third-party policing problem-oriented policing proactive policing
Police Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2,
115-153 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
